Answered By: Jennifer Harris Last Updated: Jul 12, 2017 Views: 171
In most cases, no. Here’s the problem: by definition, a wiki is a website that allows anyone to add, delete, or revise content.
Wikipedia has a general disclaimer: they make no guarantee of content validity.
- Anyone can change or alter the content by someone with a different opinion
- There’s no formal peer review; there’s no guarantee of informal review
- There’s no formal agreement between the writer and Wikipedia
While many people read (and edit) Wikipedia, there is no formal review of the articles for fact checking. In other words, there’s no peer-review of any of the material on the website. Wikipedia doesn’t guarantee any of the information is accurate.
Another question you may want to ask yourself: Does my professor/instructor require scholarly articles?
If yes, you’ll want to use resources (databases, books, etc.) from the Shapiro Library. Not all materials available at the Shapiro Library are scholarly and/or peer reviewed however, so you'll still need to evaluate any sources you find.
If you’re looking for some keywords or to find websites to get an introduction to a topic (e.g. by using the reference list on the Wikipedia page) then you may want to search Wikipedia just for background information. However, since it's not always a source of factual information it's not appropriate to use for academic research.
You can find background and other information in these sources instead:
- Britannica Online
- Credo Reference
- Gale Virtual Reference Library
- CQ Researcher
- Opposing Viewpoints in Context
You may also want to consider:
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) are a self-serve option for users to search and find answers to their questions.
Use the search box above to type your question to search for an answer or browse existing FAQs by group, topic, etc.